Total Score (AY 2568)
301 / 1000
vs AY 2567
+12 pts (+4.1%)
Overall Band
Band 3 (Early)
Target for TQC 2570: Stable Band 3 -> Move to Band 4
Top Improving Category
Cat 4: Measurement
Score increased from 50% to 55%
+5%
Driven by Dashboard Implementation
Critical Low Performer
Cat 7: Results
Still at Band 2 (Avg ~25%)
Flat
Lack of Benchmarking Data
Radar View: Capabilities vs Results (3 Years)
* Note: The gap between inner lines (Capabilities/Cat 1-6) and outer expectations highlights where Process exists but Outcomes aren't fully proven yet.
Score Trend by Major Categories
Detailed Score Breakdown & OFI Linkage
| Item Ref. | Category / Sub-item | AY 2566 (Base) |
AY 2567 (Prev) |
AY 2568 (Current) |
Trend (Δ 2568-2567) |
Band Status |
Key Finding / OFI Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strategic Interpretation for TQC 2570:
- Cat 4 (Measurement) shows positive momentum due to Dashboard implementation. Maintain this trajectory to boost Cat 7 scores.
- Cat 7 (Results) remains the bottleneck. The lack of Benchmarking (C) data prevents moving beyond Band 2. Immediate action: Establish peer group comparison with 5 partner universities.
- Cat 1 & 2 (Leadership/Strategy) are stable in Band 3 but need stronger Learning (L) evidence regarding governance evaluation cycles.